egg changed the topic of #principia to: Logs: https://esper.irclog.whitequark.org/principia | <scott_manley> anyone that doubts the wisdom of retrograde bop needs to get the hell out | https://xkcd.com/323/ | <egg> calculating the influence of lamont on Pluto is a bit silly…
<queqiao--> <M​me​ri​di​an​> it resets the flight plan based on your current trajectory
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> how hard is it to do lunar impact with pioneer styled TLI?/ any tips?
<queqiao--> <M​me​ri​di​an​> imagine you set up a very precise maneuver, and then you rotate your craft which kicks your rcs on and that rcs thrust slightly alters your current orbit/trajectory. that button resets it so it matches again
<queqiao--> Reply to "K​ag​a: how hard is it to do lunar impact with pioneer styled TLI?/ any tips? (no parking orbit b..."
<queqiao--> <M​me​ri​di​an​> after seeing your edit, extremely difficult. we dont have the proper tools to plot a direct ascent. I would not recommend that style
<queqiao--> <M​me​ri​di​an​> personally, I do impactors with a solid, unguided TLI stage, and a few unguided pioneer solids for adjustment. I don't think they are hard but I have done them many times. principia does make these kinds of craft easier imo
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> welp, parking orbit + solid kick it is then
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> luckily i have castors for that extra oomph
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> what to do if my solids actually overshoot?
<queqiao--> <e​zs​na​ck​> every engine overshoots its stated dv, find out by how much with the "MARK" and expended dv functions from mj
<queqiao--> <e​zs​na​ck​> also if your burn is eg. 15 seconds you dont fire at t-0s to node, you wanna split your dv half before and half after the node, usually 2/3 is good enough so t-10s
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> is lunar transfer planner still reliable for principia or do i need something different?
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 opened pull request #43: Fix typo in L3 pacific connection name - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/43
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 commented on pull request #33: Fixed display of multiline network status labels - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/33#issuecomment-2803576786
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] eggrobin commented on pull request #33: Fixed display of multiline network status labels - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/33#issuecomment-2803949792
<queqiao--> <R​ad​ -​ L​R-​87​ f​an​at​ic​> Is the moon's wobble added by Principia? I just noticed that the Earth sets and rises from a fixed location on the moon, is that stock RSS or is that something Principia does?
paculino_ has joined #principia
paculino has quit [Ping timeout: 190 seconds]
<queqiao--> Reply to "R​ad​ -​ L​R-​87​ f​an​at​ic​: Is the moon's wobble added by Principia? I just noticed that the Earth sets and rises fro..."
<queqiao--> <N​az​fi​b> It's actually much less pronounced with Principia. In stock, there's a 28° difference between the rotation axis of the Moon and its orbit; with Principia, the difference is more like 5°. This is what causes the Earth to move north/south across the sky as seen from the Moon. Due to the eccentricity of the Moon's orbit, the Earth will move a little east/west as well.
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> if the launch pad inc is too high for the moon, longer day lunar coasting is not possible right?
<queqiao--> Reply to "K​ag​a: how hard is it to do lunar impact with pioneer styled TLI?/ any tips? (no parking orbit b..."
<queqiao--> <B​ut​ch​er​> I have done it. My tip is don't. :p
<queqiao--> <B​ut​ch​er​> There's no real advantage over parking orbit + TLI, it complicates flight planning a lot and reduces your launch window opportunities a lot too.
<queqiao--> Reply to "B​ut​ch​er​: I have done it. My tip is don't. :p"
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> so solids are a no go?
<queqiao--> <B​ut​ch​er​> Solids are fine, no parking orbit is the issue.
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> ah, i already managed to do parking orbit
_whitelogger has joined #principia
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<queqiao--> <T​iv​ec​> so when creating a burn, i can either select "direct impulse", "active engines", or "RCS". Is there a way to manually say how long a burn is expected to take?
<queqiao--> <e​gg​> No.
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> Would be cool if you could
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> 😛
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> I ran into an issue with Gemini OAMS in RCS config where “use active RCS” would give an estimated burn time of several days for an intercept to the target vehicle
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> I fixed it by using two engines in engine configuration and two in RCS configuration, that lets me use the docking autopilot while still having a reasonable burn time with engines for Principia
<queqiao--> <B​ut​ch​er​> That sounds like a bug
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 closed pull request #37: Remove toolbar button from VAB and SPH where it cannot be used - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/37
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 closed issue #35: Skopos toolbar button should not be present in scenes where it cannot be used - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/issues/35
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 closed pull request #40: Add L-band antennas to more ground stations - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/40
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 closed pull request #43: Fix typo in L3 pacific connection name - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/43
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] eggrobin commented on pull request #40: Add L-band antennas to more ground stations - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/40#issuecomment-2807472602
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 tagged 6bf8d88 as v1.0.3.0 https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/commit/6bf8d88bc37f1fe6b77808df80aa38f1edd8df32
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 created tag v1.0.3.0 - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> Is anyone else having problems with precession when spinning up for a solid motor burn?
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> I seem to have a lot of problems keeping the spacecraft pointed in the right direction for the full duration of the burn.
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> I’ve basically started to give up on it and just have three-axis control but it feels wrong since I know so many systems are spin-stabilized IRL
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> i keep undershooting my probe TLI by 200dv, i thought that in 3 days the moon wouldve had influence on it but i guess i overestimated it. i suppose its better to have excessive DV to compensate?
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> Huh, I tend to overshoot instead.
<queqiao--> <m​ak​o> But yes usually you want excess dV IRL, it’s a margin of safety
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> my booster is only capable of 3000dv ish cuz i usually hear about principia was you can do cheaper burns thanks to principia
<queqiao--> <B​ut​ch​er​> 3150 is my normal target
<queqiao--> <B​ut​ch​er​> You'll struggle with 3000 especially as a solid.
<queqiao--> Reply to "B​ut​ch​er​: 3150 is my normal target"
<queqiao--> <K​ag​a> based from my sims, the dv i get to be able to get lunar impact is 3200
<_whitenotifier-4f63> [Skopos] Capkirk123 opened pull request #44: Preliminary Ka-Band configs - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Skopos/pull/44