egg changed the topic of #principia to: Logs: https://esper.irclog.whitequark.org/principia | <scott_manley> anyone that doubts the wisdom of retrograde bop needs to get the hell out | https://xkcd.com/323/ | <egg> calculating the influence of lamont on Pluto is a bit silly…
<queqiao--> <p​ou​nd​ o​f ​🧀​> I should be getting 3km/s for a 70 second burn
<queqiao--> <p​ou​nd​ o​f ​🧀​> but instead its giving me 1.8km, which seemingly is confusing my manuever maker
<queqiao--> <p​ou​nd​ o​f ​🧀​> what am I doing wrong here?
<queqiao--> <p​ou​nd​ o​f ​🧀​> i dunno if it would mean much but the stage in question is a gamma 2
<queqiao--> <p​ou​nd​ o​f ​🧀​> oh i swear to literally all the gods now its working again
<queqiao--> <p​ou​nd​ o​f ​🧀​> have i ever mentioned that i hate computers
<queqiao--> <S​yv​as​h ​St​ep​ov​yi​> From a technical perspective, how would principia react to multiple-quicksaves-in-parallel approach to reusable stages like the one the FMRS mod uses? I figure there might be issues with merging histories where two craft are "misbehaving" from the perspective of the other(IIRC the mod let you do a checkpoint (i.e. stage separation), guide the main stage to orbit, then go back and replay from the POV of
<queqiao--> the separated stage to (attempt to) guide it down for landing)